PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7680 |
Motherboard | MSI H61M-P23 (MS-7680) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130109 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 15 '21 at 11:27 |
Run Duration | 178 Seconds |
Run User | FIN-User |
Background CPU | 41% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
63.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 128 114 121 124 MB/s
|
45.8%
Average
|
|||
52.7%
Above average
|
||||
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
252GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 70 70 68 69 MB/s
|
24.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M391B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
49.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 104 | 5 | 144 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | HPN36B7 HP X24c |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 44x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 23x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $78 |