HP 625

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 625  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1475
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 23:36
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P360
Unknown, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 33.6
2-Core 64.3
34% 51.9 Pts
4-Core 62.9
8-Core 63.8
8% 63.3 Pts
64-Core 63.9
4% 63.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
HP(103C 1475) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.86% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.86%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 34 30 30 30 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 397
Write 308
Mixed 251
SusWrite 52.1
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 23.7
84% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 122
100% 142 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 108%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
100GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 8.7 8 8.3 8.3 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 22.6
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 8.5
25% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 21%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB
20GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 7.8 7.3 7.8 7 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Read 23.9
Write 1.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 7.7
9% 9.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.1
47% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 24%
13GB free, PID 0903
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.2 7.5 6.7 8.3 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 19.2
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 8
21% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
28% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 22%
Disk Name 1TB
294GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9 8.2 8.3 8.5 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 23.7
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 8.7
27% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 4
280% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.6% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 8
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical 625 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 625

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $48
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback