Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '21 at 17:05
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 91.5 1-Core 129 2-Core 265 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 518 8-Core 520 69% 519 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 7 Parallax 5.1 4% 5.53 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 4 Splatting 5.1 4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3ASA2TTT1TT120GB 120GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 110 32 44 49 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 443 Write 280 Mixed 254 SusWrite 62.1 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 17 43% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 41.7 DQ Write 51.1 DQ Mixed 94.8 58% 62.5 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905713-017.A00G 2x4GB 565 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 18.1 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 19.2 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 64.9 62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 48: 5R 4G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
48%	47%	43	119	87	60	15"	1280 720	BNQ771F

History: Score 42: 6R 3G 3B | Score 48: 5R 4G 11B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,070x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	930x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	278x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	355x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	299x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	131x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	157x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16