Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 01:40
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$600
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 167
2-Core 333
109% 197 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 1,273
118% 960 Pts
64-Core 2,521
169% 2,521 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$340
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 66.8
55% 80.2 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 67.3
Splatting 58
55% 65.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3123 3159 3161 756 740 742 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 2,979
Write 3,176
Mixed 2,948
SusWrite 1,947
622% 2,762 MB/s
4K Read 85.8
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 119
390% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,417
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 1,249
943% 1,268 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 417%
Great: 418%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$239
725GB free
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 399 397 399 398 398 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 507
Write 396
Mixed 296
SusWrite 398
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 30.1
106% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 96.4
80% 118 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 106%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$300
870GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 457 457 456 457 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 448
Mixed 436
SusWrite 457
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 58.7
190% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 117%
Great: 138%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$52
901GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 175 177 176 176 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 145
Write 165
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 177
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 107%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 235 234 234 237 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 138%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 75.4
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 41.2
149% 52 GB/s
SC Read 30.3
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 136%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 14: 1R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 16% 38 8 6 60 22" 1680 1050 DELD01F DELL E2209W
History: Score 27: 3R 3G 3B | Score 14: 1R 2G 3B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 34,420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,009
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback