PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B78 |
Motherboard | MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180628 |
Uptime | 4.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 12 '21 at 01:01 |
Run Duration | 220 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 254C) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
15.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 280 279 293 291 292 MB/s
|
69.5%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
351GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 76 78 77 78 MB/s
|
45.2%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 211 207 214 207 212 MB/s
|
98%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
62.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
71% | 46% | 41 | 139 | 82 | 120 | 23.5" | 1920 1080 | MSI1462 Optix G24C |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples | 489x |
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples | 105x |
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples | 94x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 79x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 70x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 63x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $545 |