Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '21 at 00:36
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 221
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 491
55% 424 Pts
64-Core 473
32% 473 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 85%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 945 530 398 340 266 216 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 742
Mixed 916
SusWrite 449
133% 580 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 45
145% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 614
450% 580 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 106%
Great: 181%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 5: 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 17% 18 105 6 60 0" 1920 1080
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 3,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback