Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 790
78% 639 Pts
64-Core 1318
82% 1318 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.9
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$44
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 414 266 390 310 229 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 727
Write 569
Mixed 280
SusWrite 333
106% 477 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 33.2
133% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 274
212% 295 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 103%
Great: 228%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
94GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 300 303 301 299 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 484
Mixed 395
SusWrite 319
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 51.4
171% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 368
278% 373 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
134GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 84 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49% Average
Read 85.3
Write 35
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 85.4
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 25.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN3393 HP 24ea
Typical TUF B450M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,927 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $344
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback