MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Micro-Star MS-7C52
Motherboard	MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$97 52,721 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 213 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 652 63% 518 Pts	64-Core 803 50% 803 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.2 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.6% Above average	Lighting 64 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 85.7 52% 73 fps	MRender 69.1 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 52.7 51% 63.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD240LE 240GB 1,978 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 7.5 62 30 12 4.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	34.8% Below average	Read 495 Write 433 Mixed 362 SusWrite 73.4 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 9.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 93%
Jamesdonkey JD240LE 240GB 1,978 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 60GB free Firmware: JD2020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 24 94 45 29 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 504 Write 437 Mixed 380 SusWrite 85 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 90.6 4K Mixed 18.7 110% 44.9 MB/s	DQ Read 85.3 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 23.3 73% 150 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB 17,908 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.3 MC Write 36 MC Mixed 31.9 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.3 SC Write 30.9 SC Mixed 27.6 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	120	27"	1280 720	LYC0001 GPR27C1MS144

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,091x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	593x
Ryzen 5 3500XAMD $160Bench 82%, 33,544 samples	296x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	324x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	309x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	305x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	147x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	94x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	92x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	235x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	155x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $471

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16