Toshiba Satellite L510

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L510  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory2.5 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 15:16
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Memory 29
1-Core 37
2-Core 77.7
28% 47.9 Pts
4-Core 78.8
8-Core 75.1
11% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 77.3
5% 77.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Toshiba(1179 FF11)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.37 fps
Splatting 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB2OC64G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 56 54 58 37 13 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 62.9
Write 61.9
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 44.8
37% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.4
11% 3.73 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4 GB/s
Latency 261
15% 261 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Satellite L510 Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $29
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback