Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200525
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 14:12
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 93.5 1-Core 44.2 2-Core 96.2 52% 78 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 586 64% 508 Pts	64-Core 702 44% 702 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1B4E) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.8% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 40 Parallax 60.6 33% 46.9 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 61.8 51% 62.3 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,028 Write 1,169 Mixed 1,017 240% 1,072 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 55.2 187% 66.8 MB/s	DQ Read 858 DQ Write 709 DQ Mixed 719 556% 762 MB/s
Poor: 95% Great: 167%
Samsung HM251JI 250GB 908 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 56GB free Firmware: 2SS00_03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 49 49 49 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 38.5 Write 44.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 48.1 29% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GB 73,050 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.4% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 11.6 MC Mixed 9.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 12 33% 11.7 GB/s	Latency 60.9 66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	17.3"	1280 720	AUO429D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	577x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	46x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	324x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	299x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	186x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	110x
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	53x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	141x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	119x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	59x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16