PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B460 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200407 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Jul 11 '21 at 10:31 |
Run Duration | 282 Seconds |
Run User | HRV-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100-$94
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$88
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 1603 1606 1720 1191 631 MB/s
|
218%
Outstanding
|
|||
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$30
189GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 163 103 105 106 141 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
414GB free
Firmware: SD23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 75 72 74 74 77 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
241GB free
Firmware: SD28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 65 63 66 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Basic 2TB
610GB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 107 111 111 106 MB/s
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
42%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 7 | 5 | 30 | 84.6" | 1280 720 | SAM7016 SAMSUNG |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 410x |
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 127x |
Core i7-10700Intel $232Bench 93%, 71,010 samples | 78x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 93x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 79x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 70x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $434 |