Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX1310 M1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX1310 M1 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3219-A1
Memory	15 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150915
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 09:14
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200 2,511 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 110 2-Core 221 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 580 58% 471 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 2454) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 32.2 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 32.9 26% 33.3 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 34.2 Splatting 23.5 25% 31.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 34 49 31 92 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 150 Write 132 Mixed 92.3 SusWrite 57.1 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 58GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 41 35 33 34 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 170 Write 96.5 Mixed 87.5 SusWrite 31 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-065.A00LF Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 99U5471-065.A00LF Micron 18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 20 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIMERGY TX1310 M1 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX1310 M1

CPU
Xeon E3-1226 v3Intel $256Bench 71%, 2,019 samples	29x
Xeon E3-1230L v3IntelBench 64%, 22 samples	1x
Xeon E3-1246 v3Intel $200Bench 73%, 2,511 samples	1x

GPU
HD Graphics P4600IntelBench 3%, 2,141 samples	21x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x
SSD370 256GBTranscend $110Bench 80%, 5,249 samples	1x
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	1x

RAM
99U5458-002.A00LF ACR256X64D3U1333C9 99U5458-002.A00LF ACR256X64D3U1333C9 8GBKingstonBench 53%, 10 samples	6x
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 32%, 189 samples	4x
HMT41GU7BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 31%, 148 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $301

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16