Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
Motherboard	Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '21 at 09:02
Run Duration	239 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 127 2-Core 255 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 927 86% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,292 80% 1,292 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% EVGA(3842 2383) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (145 fps cap detected)	114% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 145 Parallax 145 118% 145 fps	MRender 145 Gravity 145 Splatting 136 116% 142 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 309 184 177 171 164 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 483 Mixed 397 SusWrite 234 90% 403 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 54.2 180% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 357 268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 15GB free Firmware: 2CV102HD SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 78 49 3.1 51 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 254 Write 85.5 Mixed 107 SusWrite 56.7 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 11.6 79% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 79.4 DQ Mixed 81.2 70% 105 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 44%
Pcie SSD 1TB 40,637 User benchmarks, average bench 210% 17GB free Firmware: E8FM12.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 637 Write 634 Mixed 776 153% 682 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 96.4 4K Mixed 50.7 178% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,020 DQ Write 582 DQ Mixed 695 546% 765 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 284%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 513GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 481 482 485 486 486 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 483 Mixed 440 SusWrite 471 107% 476 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 57.3 188% 64.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 357 268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 133%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 176 173 176 170 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 104%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 300GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 125 125 127 125 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 168 Write 138 Mixed 88 SusWrite 125 95% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 108%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 64GB 1,850 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 28GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 12 11 14 13 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 8.7 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 10.9 16% 13.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 2.9 224% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 581 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 36.3 MC Mixed 28.1 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 40.2 SC Mixed 28.6 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 12: 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
12%	29%	21	12	10	60	27"	1280 720	ACI27EC ROG PG279Q

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $350

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	3,310x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,239x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	485x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	825x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	622x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	546x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	689x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	602x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	330x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	297x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	263x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	245x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,407

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16