HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateJul 11 '21 at 03:18
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 153
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 266
37% 273 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.2
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 16.8
15% 17.4 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 218 211 206 201 213 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 470
Write 194
Mixed 224
SusWrite 213
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 26
92% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 247
199% 286 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
158GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 108 104 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 137
Write 119
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 106
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 113%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 107 108 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 14.5
Write 30
Mixed 31.5
SusWrite 107
34% 45.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 75
Write 64.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 69.3
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 83%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
14GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 8.8
Mixed 11.8
SusWrite 11.8
16% 12.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
67% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG V01D3LF4GB26826813 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback