PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 73.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110406 |
Uptime | 3.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 11 '21 at 03:18 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | BGR-User |
Background CPU | 70% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 218 211 206 201 213 MB/s
|
73.7%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
158GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 108 104 108 108 MB/s
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 107 108 105 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
41.6%
Average
|
||||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
14GB free, PID 0715
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
7.37%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.4%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 684x |
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 592x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 315x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 137x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 86x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |