Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV_FA506IV (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506IV
Memory	4.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 21:48
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 20,504 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 49.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 260 77% 148 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 590 49% 425 Pts	64-Core 841 52% 841 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 1E21) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.09 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Lighting 17.8 Reflection 97.5 Parallax 23.8 14% 46.4 fps	MRender 13.5 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 17.1 14% 16.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 306GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 74 47 28 18 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Read 863 Write 876 Mixed 666 SusWrite 56.7 137% 615 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 39.7 156% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 146 DQ Write 66.6 DQ Mixed 28.4 42% 80.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 185%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 875GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 7.1 8.5 11 2.2 2.2 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	0.66% Terrible	Read 3.5 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5.8 1% 4.32 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.3 0% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 128%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 9TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 22 20 21 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 30.2 Mixed 16.9 SusWrite 21.8 17% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.8 487% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 31.9 86% 30.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 12.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 20,504 samples	553x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	64x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	356x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	261x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	99x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	89x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBWDCBench 224%, 12,046 samples	54x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	125x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	121x
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	31x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16