Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130410
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 20:14
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217 8,137 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 205 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 500 54% 429 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68 Reflection 71.5 Parallax 67.6 55% 69 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 69.5 Splatting 66.5 56% 68 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 499 Write 409 Mixed 27.1 68% 312 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 8 58% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 0.3 71% 167 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 57GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 332 245 229 224 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 457 Mixed 385 SusWrite 280 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 38.4 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 43.9 173% 64.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 347 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 134GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 102 104 105 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 139 Write 136 Mixed 89.2 SusWrite 104 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 108%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB 10,272 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 10GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 90 89 90 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 71.4 Write 30.6 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 88.9 44% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 77%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4.5TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 114 115 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Read 124 Write 108 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 113 139% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 0.7 300% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 65%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1GB free, PID 0745 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 26.6 Write 13.2 Mixed 21.6 24% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.4 139% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 13 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	9%	22	108	6	144	24.5"	1920 1080	HPN3425 OMEN by HP 25

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	195x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16