Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 UD4 Pro
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191128
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '21 at 17:35
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850 3,007 User benchmarks, average bench 87% , 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 68.9 1-Core 143 2-Core 289 88% 167 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 1,080 97% 816 Pts	64-Core 2,156 134% 2,156 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Gigabyte(1458 4008) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 155 Parallax 156 126% 155 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 133 Splatting 120 117% 147 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 317 304 301 311 303 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 322 Mixed 266 SusWrite 309 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 35 136% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 249 215% 318 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 128%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB 74,123 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 270GB free Firmware: 401020WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 429 427 429 423 424 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 451 Write 431 Mixed 351 SusWrite 427 94% 415 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 87.8 4K Mixed 31.2 122% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 221 198% 302 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 117%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 134GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2001 743 566 569 569 569 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 2094 Write 1,992 Mixed 1,339 SusWrite 836 350% 1,565 MB/s	4K Read 50 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 78.6 246% 86.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,158 DQ Write 867 DQ Mixed 985 744% 1,004 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 757GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 165 164 166 165 166 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 131 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 163 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 146GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 57 54 54 56 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34% Below average	Read 63.9 Write 52.6 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 54.7 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 200GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 61 61 62 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 49.9 Write 56.7 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 59.4 34% 46.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.3 85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 410GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 111 112 114 114 114 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 116 Write 105 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 112 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 114 114 114 114 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 126 Write 122 Mixed 90 SusWrite 112 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 119 122 122 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 116 Write 112 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 120 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 75%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 264GB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 108 109 109 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 105 Write 106 Mixed 59.6 SusWrite 108 69% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.2% Above average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 16.1 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 10.2 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	144	27"	1280 720	MSI3FA6 MSI MAG271CR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 174%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 189%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4 Pro-CF

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	162x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	88x
Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,275Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	70x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	50x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	38x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	45x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	24x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	20x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	138x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	89x
4x16GBUnknownBench 98%, 9,153 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $1,365

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16