Turbo-x Z370 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive255% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTurbo-x Z370 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming 7
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 151
2-Core 257
95% 168 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 980
90% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
264GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1066 836 834 837 839 829 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 2,567
Write 2,225
Mixed 1,738
SusWrite 874
413% 1,851 MB/s
4K Read 66.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 78.4
255% 82.2 MB/s
DQ Read 514
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 617
413% 499 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 255%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
116GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,496
Write 2,228
Mixed 1,432
455% 2,052 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 76.7
251% 81 MB/s
DQ Read 1223
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 591
489% 727 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
88GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 66 57 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 501
Write 431
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 128
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 14.6
4K Mixed 9.2
38% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 1.2
77% 183 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 184 184 184 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 186
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 181
103% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR32GX4M2C3333C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 31.3
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 46.2
SC Mixed 30.9
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 56
71% 56 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 7 165 0" 1280 720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback