HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8105
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '21 at 13:09
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 185
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 284
42% 304 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 1C02) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 60.7
53% 64.4 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 66.9
Splatting 61.2
53% 64.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 82 105 100 102 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 232
Write 150
Mixed 181
SusWrite 98.1
37% 165 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 39.2
143% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 94.3
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 110
87% 119 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
105GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 96 107 96 112 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 145
Write 110
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 96.9
70% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 3R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 18% 28 109 5 60 21.5" 1920 1080 PHL08A3 221P3LPY
Typical ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF Builds (Compare 266 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2.5 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $122
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback