DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory13.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 21:35
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon X5675
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 75
2-Core 150
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 464
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 554
37% 554 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$400
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 112
Parallax 114
84% 110 fps
MRender 96.6
Gravity 104
Splatting 101
83% 100 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 88%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT49D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 115 117 110 120 120 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.5% Average
Read 184
Write 120
Mixed 117
SusWrite 115
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 19.8
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 50.3
60% 106 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 71%
Cl1-3d128-q11 NVMe LITEON 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 22301111 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 106 101 101 108 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1256
Write 605
Mixed 696
SusWrite 168
150% 681 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 65.4
4K Mixed 23.7
110% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 329
262% 363 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 110%
Great: 136%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
233GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 102 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60% Good
Read 106
Write 94.9
Mixed 66
SusWrite 104
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 8.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 10.2
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $314
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback