Asus PRIME Q270M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Q270M-C (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '21 at 22:33
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 83% 147 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 460 54% 418 Pts	64-Core 456 28% 456 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro W7100 840 User benchmarks, average bench 30% AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.2% Below average	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 47.2 Parallax 47 30% 43.6 fps	MRender 48.7 Gravity 36 Splatting 31.9 31% 38.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30 4,522 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0212B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 57 58 58 60 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 507 Write 284 Mixed 412 SusWrite 67.4 70% 317 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 33.6 162% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 51.3 95% 183 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 95%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 200GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 87 92 92 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 84.4 Write 83.9 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 90.2 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend TS1GLH64V6B 1x8GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	43.7% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 11.8 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 13.3 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	60	40"	1280 701	SAM0658 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Q270M-C Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Q270M-C

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	66x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	26x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	22x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	18x

SSD
SSDSCKKW512G8 512GBIntelBench 107%, 674 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	11x
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	8x

RAM
9905702-012.A00G 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 177 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 77%, 9,729 samples	8x
BLS8G4D26BFSB.16FBR2 4x8GBCrucialBench 84%, 34 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $167

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16