Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Intel To be filled by O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 65.9 2-Core 167 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 339 8-Core 683 60% 511 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 407B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 470.05 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.1% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 118 Parallax 123 99% 121 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 108 Splatting 91.8 90% 113 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD 8,682 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS303320 SusWrite @10s intervals: 998 286 286 285 286 287 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	Read 988 Write 1,098 Mixed 957 SusWrite 404 194% 862 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 71.8 4K Mixed 39.8 129% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 587 DQ Write 433 DQ Mixed 547 399% 522 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 214%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 900GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 192 191 189 191 192 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 177 Mixed 71.9 SusWrite 192 116% 160 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5471-016.A 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 9.4 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 8.8 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 77 52% 77 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 31%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 42: 4R 4G 10B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
42%	45%	40	291	199	60	27"	1920 1080	BNQ7952 BenQ EW2780

History: Score 24: 2R 3G 5B | Score 42: 4R 4G 10B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	109x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	43x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	38x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	95x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	55x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	9x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	257x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	92x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16