Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '21 at 06:29
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	CRI-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Memory 88.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 254 87% 157 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 837 82% 670 Pts	64-Core 1,057 65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$279 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% EVGA(3842 3657) CLim: 2287 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 131 Parallax 137 118% 137 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 112 Splatting 97.9 98% 124 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 106%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB 56,609 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 672GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3402101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 439 442 445 448 431 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	71% Very good	Read 400 Write 402 Mixed 408 SusWrite 432 93% 410 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 17.6 58% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 95 113% 190 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB 11,608 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.3% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 30.6 MC Mixed 21.8 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 33.5 SC Mixed 23.8 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 6: 0R 2G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
6%	18%	11	111	8	144	24"	1920 1080	GSM5B73 LG ULTRAGEAR

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 3,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 137%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 134%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B460M-PLUS (WI-FI) - $130

CPU
Core i7-10700FIntel $180Bench 93%, 44,448 samples	854x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	772x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	415x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	479x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	375x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	355x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	250x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	116x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	93x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	207x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	131x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	129x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $784

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16