Fujitsu CELSIUS H920

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS H920 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB258
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130130
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '21 at 10:19
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 166 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 428 44% 357 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M 631 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Fujitsu(10CF 1761) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2733 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 19.7 Parallax 17.3 11% 16.8 fps	MRender 18 Gravity 17.2 Splatting 14.6 13% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 29 4.8 6.2 4.6 156 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 418 Write 313 Mixed 314 SusWrite 66.6 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 11.8 47% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 82.7 DQ Mixed 31.3 41% 75 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 55%
Toshiba MK6461GSYN 640GB-$55 624 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 347GB free Firmware: MH000K SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 106 107 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 79.4 Write 99.4 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 107 59% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 4x2GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 17 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 87.4 46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 28: 4R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
28%	7%	121	68	55	60	17.3"	1920 1080	FUJ5D12

History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 28: 4R 2G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS H920 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H920

CPU
Core i7-3720QMIntel $100Bench 65%, 9,911 samples	9x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	6x
Core i7-3820QMIntel $275Bench 66%, 3,135 samples	3x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	16x
Quadro K3000MNvidiaBench 8%, 2,310 samples	6x
Quadro K4000MNvidiaBench 12%, 631 samples	2x

SSD
SKC600512G 512GBKingstonBench 109%, 5,390 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	2x

RAM
HMT325S6CFR8A-PB 4x2GBHynixBench 53%, 12 samples	3x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 16GBSamsungBench 30%, 3 samples	3x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16