Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte A320M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210105
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 06 '21 at 08:11
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 3000G-$80 11,076 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 160 66% 111 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 282 37% 279 Pts	64-Core 276 17% 276 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics 27,821 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 7.9 5% 7.6 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 11.4 8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 12 8GB SSD 58 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.9 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 462 Write 384 Mixed 215 78% 354 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 23.6 109% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 32.1 65% 132 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 89%
Hitachi HTS543225A7A384 250GB 2,305 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 43GB free Firmware: ESBOA70F SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 45 45 46 46 46 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 44.9 Write 36.8 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 44.8 29% 39.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 41%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 320GB-$54 8,918 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 142GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 71 71 70 70 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 60.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 69.9 41% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BL8G30C15U4R.M8FE1 2x8GB 1,989 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 39.7 MC Mixed 34.2 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.8 SC Write 33.8 SC Mixed 26.4 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 74.5 54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	17"	1280 720	GSM449B L1742

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,888 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	332x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	325x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	283x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	225x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	192x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	171x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	163x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	66x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	59x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	60x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	57x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $233

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16