Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161208
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 27 '17 at 21:13
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 632
54% 462 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 3685) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 54.9
Parallax 44.5
39% 49 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 47.7
Splatting 53.8
46% 56.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,316
Write 1,135
Mixed 1,313
349% 1,588 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 36
198% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 427
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 118
163% 299 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 237%
Great: 236%
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
60GB free
Firmware: 1.0.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 441
Write 122
Mixed 120
49% 228 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 8.86
4K Mixed 4.97
38% 10.6 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 7.28
DQ Mixed 4.73
7% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
842GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 182
Mixed 177
137% 182 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.34
106% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback