Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200702
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '21 at 22:51
Run Duration	371 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 227 76% 138 Pts	4-Core 441 8-Core 826 76% 633 Pts	64-Core 1,240 77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1355 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.8% Above average	Lighting 64 Reflection 63.2 Parallax 87.6 52% 71.6 fps	MRender 65.5 Gravity 70.4 Splatting 46.2 48% 60.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60 15,626 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 1032 1063 1125 1113 1134 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	227% Outstanding	Read 2,244 Write 1,269 Mixed 1,142 SusWrite 1,111 320% 1,441 MB/s	4K Read 52.5 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 46.8 161% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 807 DQ Write 89.2 DQ Mixed 184 201% 360 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 227% Great: 333%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 42GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 103 100 99 99 102 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Read 320 Write 120 Mixed 162 SusWrite 102 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 27.9 96% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 88.6 DQ Mixed 93.7 70% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 73%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 920GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 382 390 389 394 406 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 471 Write 433 Mixed 397 SusWrite 396 95% 424 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 37 130% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 94.6 DQ Mixed 180 147% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 133%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$178 20,205 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 3TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 94 91 92 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 141 Write 133 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 93.4 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 98%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 130 127 128 131 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 163 Write 158 Mixed 88.5 SusWrite 130 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 100%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$221 256 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 5.5TB free Firmware: 80.H0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 147 148 145 149 157 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 155 Write 153 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 150 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1.3 223% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 100%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 138 135 135 140 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Read 156 Write 134 Mixed 89 SusWrite 138 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 100%
WD WD82PURZ-85TEUY0 8TB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 232 230 228 228 234 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 224 Write 228 Mixed 107 SusWrite 231 144% 197 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 2.1 376% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 139%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 3.5TB free, PID 25ff Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 112 113 112 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 119 Write 105 Mixed 72 SusWrite 112 136% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7 4K Mixed 0.8 270% 3 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR32GX4M4A2666C16 4x8GB 582 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.7% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 25 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.7 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 22.9 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
2%	2%	115	328	265	144	34.1"	1707 720	GSM76FE LG ULTRAWIDE

History: Score 6: 1R 0G 1B | Score 2: 0R 0G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 2: 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)