Acer Aspire A717-72G

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	25.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Acer Aspire A717-72G (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Charizard_CFS
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '21 at 20:39
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 82.4 1-Core 74 2-Core 147 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 383 42% 333 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Acer(1025 1261) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1768 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Lighting 31.8 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 32.7 26% 31.6 fps	MRender 34.8 Gravity 34.5 Splatting 21.2 24% 30.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2200 Write 1,925 Mixed 1,398 409% 1,841 MB/s	4K Read 51 4K Write 91.9 4K Mixed 63.8 208% 68.9 MB/s	DQ Read 620 DQ Write 416 DQ Mixed 553 403% 530 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 57GB free Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 256 169 170 171 170 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	84.3% Excellent	Read 492 Write 251 Mixed 316 SusWrite 188 69% 312 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 66.5 4K Mixed 35.5 133% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 326 229% 294 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 132%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB 9,568 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 26.9 88% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 19.7 56% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 27: 2R 2G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
27%	50%	30	267	189	120	27"	1920 1080	MSI1462 Optix MAG27C

History: Score 30: 3R 1G 12B | Score 27: 2R 2G 11B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire A717-72G Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A717-72G

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	277x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	112x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	190x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	125x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	74x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	55x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	32x
760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $33Bench 190%, 20,095 samples	31x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	93x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	45x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 76%, 20,226 samples	40x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $49

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16