Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200331
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 05 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	57%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 68.5 1-Core 102 2-Core 169 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 466 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.9% Average	Lighting 55.7 Reflection 55.7 Parallax 51.4 45% 54.3 fps	MRender 59.6 Gravity 47.1 Splatting 45.8 41% 50.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 380 399 424 238 4.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 406 Write 375 Mixed 322 SusWrite 290 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 37.5 127% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 225 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 185 163% 240 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 588GB free Firmware: JU000D SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 112 113 114 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 136 Write 131 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 113 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 1x8GB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 10 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 13.5 SC Mixed 13 37% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 20: 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	15%	41	103	1	144	23.8"	1920 1080	PHLC244 PHL 242E1GJ

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	3,192x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,499x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	460x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	721x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	560x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	509x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	435x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	306x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	294x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	206x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	162x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16