Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X2 Dual Core L310 325 User benchmarks, average bench 25% Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Memory 48.8 1-Core 17.1 2-Core 34.7 24% 33.5 Pts	4-Core 33.6 8-Core 34 4% 33.8 Pts	64-Core 34.3 2% 34.3 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200 5,730 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 028D) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.6 Parallax 2.7 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 1.5 1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 167 88 130 94 165 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38% Below average	Read 232 Write 156 Mixed 203 SusWrite 136 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 16.6 55% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 74.9 DQ Write 66.8 DQ Mixed 68.8 52% 70.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 410GB free Firmware: PB4OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 59 53 56 50 64 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 57.7 Write 61 Mixed 34 SusWrite 57.5 39% 52.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HYMP125S64CP8-S6 2x2GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 266 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.17 GB/s	Latency 165 24% 165 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16