Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180529
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 16:08
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	SUR-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 140 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 234 36% 262 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 8C97) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.5% Poor	Lighting 33.5 Reflection 41.1 Parallax 32.9 27% 35.8 fps	MRender 35.6 Gravity 34 Splatting 24.1 25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 480GB 1,715 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427C SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 317 317 316 280 289 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 377 Write 285 Mixed 296 SusWrite 298 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 22.4 83% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 322 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 252 210% 302 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 217%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$81 3,058 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 110 114 115 115 115 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 149 Write 144 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 114 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 1x8GB 2,709 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.2% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 87.6 46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 29: 2R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	38%	34	216	76	60	21.6"	1680 1050	HWP280B HP w2216

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	199x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	108x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	105x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	125x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	90x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	59x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	84x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	27x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	12x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16