Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '21 at 10:53
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	38%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X-$150 15,293 User benchmarks, average bench 80% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 66.9 1-Core 142 2-Core 250 83% 153 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 606 64% 511 Pts	64-Core 698 43% 698 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Nvidia(10DE 134D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90% Outstanding	Lighting 113 Reflection 125 Parallax 108 92% 115 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 97.7 Splatting 92 86% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 250GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 301 303 303 293 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 275 Write 188 Mixed 304 SusWrite 299 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 94.2 4K Mixed 31.2 138% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 231 195% 284 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 181 181 179 182 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 176 Mixed 92.6 SusWrite 181 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 29.1 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 25.1 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	165	27"	1280 720	LYC0000 RAC270

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	117x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	82x
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $97Bench 72%, 52,721 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	50x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	16x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	24x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBUnknownBench 79%, 17,908 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $346

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16