| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Biostar TA970 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140807 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 03 '21 at 21:50 |
| Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.7%
Good
|
63% 103 Pts
|
42% 342 Pts
|
27% 430 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
90.1%
Outstanding
|
105% 131 fps
|
62% 85.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
277GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 12 12 6.7 13 MB/s
|
36.8%
Below average
|
39% 180 MB/s
|
66% 17.4 MB/s
|
14% 21.3 MB/s
|
|
Vaseky V800/128G 128GB
26GB free
Firmware: P0921A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 53 58 62 62 62 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
33% 152 MB/s
|
38% 9.17 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
278GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
44.4%
Average
|
31% 42.8 MB/s
|
107% 0.63 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 32GB
933, 933, 933, 933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
|
47.8%
Average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
58% 68.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 37: 4R 4G 5B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37% | 35% | 37 | 302 | 259 | 60 | 31.5" | 1920 1080 | SAM0D35 C32F391 |
History: Score 28: 4R 2G 2B | Score 37: 4R 4G 5B
Typical TA970 Builds (Compare 177 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar TA970 - $125
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 47x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 46x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 6x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $352 |