HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '21 at 14:35
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 88 2-Core 174 69% 116 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 338 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 29 Parallax 34.8 20% 29.5 fps	MRender 28.3 Gravity 27 Splatting 23.2 21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 120 115 100 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 129 Write 126 Mixed 77 SusWrite 113 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 70%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 381GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 103 105 100 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 103 Write 103 Mixed 62 SusWrite 102 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 M378B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston K1N7HK-ELC 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.7% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	47	50	30	75	17"	1280 1024	HWP2649 HP L1740

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	685x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	593x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16