PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7C13 |
Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7C13) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190412 |
Uptime | 10597.9 Days |
Run Date | Jul 03 '21 at 11:41 |
Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WDC WDS250G2B0A 250GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 176 177 190 169 170 MB/s
|
78.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 526x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 313x |
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 124x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 120x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 116x |
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 96x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $161 |