Acer Nitro N50-610

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Acer Nitro N50-610 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Nitro N50-610
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210119
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '21 at 09:14
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$99 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Memory 89.4 1-Core 130 2-Core 256 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 487 8-Core 775 78% 631 Pts	64-Core 1051 65% 1051 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.7% Average	Lighting 53.9 Reflection 56.1 Parallax 48.5 44% 52.8 fps	MRender 42.3 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 44.8 37% 45.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GB 8,930 User benchmarks, average bench 132% 403GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 667 618 678 660 685 701 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,072 Write 745 Mixed 876 SusWrite 668 188% 840 MB/s	4K Read 39.3 4K Write 99.5 4K Mixed 55 183% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 790 DQ Write 488 DQ Mixed 676 494% 651 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 172%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 825 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 6TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 35.2 Write 36.3 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 41.2 25% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.8 212% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 89%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 8TB 825 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 6TB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 35.1 Write 36.3 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 41.3 26% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.8 212% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 89%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 404GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 35 35 36 37 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 32.2 Write 29.2 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 35.7 42% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 41GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 34 25 26 22 24 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 148 Write 54.6 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 32.5 90% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.8 185% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 40%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 118 121 121 122 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 113 Write 116 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 120 145% 107 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 0.9 372% 4.27 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 4.4 DQ Mixed 1.3 196% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 95%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB 3,723 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 123 128 127 127 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 132 Write 138 Mixed 107 SusWrite 126 171% 126 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 1 314% 4 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 1x8GB 1,124 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (53^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.6% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 9.1 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 12.8 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	6	60	31.5"	1280 720	GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Nitro N50-610 Builds (Compare 3,251 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

System: Acer Nitro N50-610

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	2,241x
Core i5-10400Intel $117Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	504x
Core i7-10700Intel $233Bench 93%, 71,010 samples	454x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	1,356x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	830x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	226x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	457x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 169%, 12,303 samples	361x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	167x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	195x
ACR26D4U9S1KA-4 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 12GBKingstonBench 56%, 475 samples	194x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	162x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $254

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16