PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120109 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Jul 03 '21 at 00:00 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 43% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
|
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ AGILITY3 90GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 63 60 62 59 MB/s
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$30
42GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 65 96 87 87 64 MB/s
|
44.8%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
35% | 33% | 46 | 83 | 6 | 60 | 21.5" | 1920 1080 | SAM08A3 S22B150 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 59x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 46x |
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 33x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 18x |
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples | 18x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $366 |