Acer Predator G5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive20.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G5910
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 21:25
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 96
2-Core 170
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 463
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6750
Sapphire(174B EA60) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 9.8
9% 10.7 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 8
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.3 29 59 60 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.5% Poor
Read 218
Write 198
Mixed 196
SusWrite 28
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 102%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
335GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.9 38 61 62 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 74
Write 70.5
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 30.6
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
120GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 66 69 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 82.4
Write 76.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 68
51% 69.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
849GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 66 69 68 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 89.4
Write 90.3
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 68
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 33 32 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 29.6
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 32
44% 33 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.8
219% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Other CT51264BD160B.C16F Samsung M378B5273BH1-CH9 CT51264BD160B.C16F Samsung M378B5273BH1-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI249A ASUS VS247
Typical Predator G5910 Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $544
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback