Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	70% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 80 1-Core 156 2-Core 307 97% 181 Pts	4-Core 575 8-Core 1,071 98% 823 Pts	64-Core 1,467 91% 1,467 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70% Very good	Lighting 92 Reflection 89.9 Parallax 78.4 75% 86.8 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 81.2 Splatting 73.3 60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX8100NP 512GB 9,167 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 383GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB421D57 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1399 1488 1299 1119 1515 958 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	318% Outstanding	Read 2,702 Write 1429 Mixed 1,458 SusWrite 1,296 382% 1,721 MB/s	4K Read 57.9 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 80.1 272% 97.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1194 DQ Write 908 DQ Mixed 1,313 911% 1,138 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 318% Great: 320%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 207 201 203 204 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 207 Write 191 Mixed 78.9 SusWrite 203 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB 5,165 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 22.6 MC Mixed 32.2 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 26.4 SC Write 20.7 SC Mixed 34.2 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 80.5 50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	10	7	60	18.9"	1280 720	HSD8990 CY199

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	157x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	148x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	114x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	110x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	66x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	52x

SSD
SPECTRIX S40G 512GBXPGBench 209%, 26,235 samples	31x
GAMMIX S41 1TBXPGBench 257%, 856 samples	21x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	19x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	37x
DDR4 3600 2x8GBAdataBench 95%, 15,812 samples	25x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBTeamBench 82%, 22,274 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $550

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16