Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131231
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 16:32
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 182
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 458
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
XFX(1682 304A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 42 4.7 16 104 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 244
Write 199
Mixed 151
SusWrite 70.4
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 15.8
61% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 67.6
DQ Mixed 41.1
44% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 53%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
13GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 68 54 67 63 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 47.2
Write 41.8
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 63.7
36% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
264GB free
Firmware: MF8OAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 98 97 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 97.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 97.9
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 94%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
303GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 113
Write 111
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 107
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
262GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 77 78 78 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 51.8
Write 74.1
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 77.1
43% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 20" 1280 720 SAM0599 SyncMaster
Typical GA-Z77M-D3H Builds (Compare 868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H - $145

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $529
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback