Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics213% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory119.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '21 at 01:45
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 212
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 857
76% 647 Pts
64-Core 1,406
87% 1,406 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
EVGA(3842 3968) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
213% Outstanding
Lighting 315
Reflection 274
Parallax 354
256% 314 fps
MRender 361
Gravity 262
Splatting 185
210% 269 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 213%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1349 1017 1028 1058 1066 1003 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,362
Write 2,010
Mixed 1,169
SusWrite 1087
370% 1,657 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 69.9
232% 86.6 MB/s
DQ Read 822
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 761
570% 760 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 267%
Great: 371%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
398GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 271 274 274 273 273 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 334
Write 318
Mixed 287
SusWrite 270
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 47.4
156% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 43.5
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 58
50% 72.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320
2TB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 217 219 220 219 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 130%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 144 142 148 148 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 136
Write 79.9
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 146
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
521GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 142
Write 135
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 85.7
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 54.2
MC Write 53.9
MC Mixed 45.8
147% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 128%
Great: 177%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27" 1280 720 ENC3041 CG279X
Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback