HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dh1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dh1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8746
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200915
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 02 '21 at 00:09
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	MAR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10300H 82,821 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 98.6 2-Core 199 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 548 56% 450 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8746) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.9% Good	Lighting 83.7 Reflection 135 Parallax 86.4 68% 102 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 78.3 Splatting 79.8 70% 87.1 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB 3,650 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXH Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,735 Write 1,808 Mixed 1,228 354% 1,590 MB/s	4K Read 51.8 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 67.1 218% 73.6 MB/s	DQ Read 876 DQ Write 674 DQ Mixed 779 582% 776 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 253%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB 7,320 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 96GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 72 71 69 63 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 95.8 Write 94.8 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 70.3 59% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.3 142% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB 69,946 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 35.5 MC Mixed 25.5 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 23.4 71% 24.8 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 34: 2R 7G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
34%	41%	29	155	120	144	15.5"	1536 864	AUO82ED

History: Score 38: 4R 6G 0B | Score 34: 2R 7G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dh1xxx Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dh1xxx

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	1,215x
Core i5-10300HIntelBench 74%, 82,821 samples	94x
Core i9-10885HIntelBench 81%, 6,135 samples	48x

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	495x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	310x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	304x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 17,828 samples	314x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	290x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1006 512GBWDCBench 214%, 5,076 samples	77x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	364x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	179x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16