Acer Aspire XC-780

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

System	Acer Aspire XC-780 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire XC-780
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160426
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '21 at 15:06
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 83.5 1-Core 107 2-Core 211 76% 134 Pts	4-Core 403 8-Core 394 54% 398 Pts	64-Core 399 25% 399 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 2164 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 19.9 Reflection 21.9 Parallax 21 16% 20.9 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 19 17% 20.4 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 15%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SNS8151S396GG 96GB 657 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 271 Write 64.7 Mixed 120 33% 152 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 7.2 69% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 93.4 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 6.5 18% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 871GB free Firmware: CC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 195 Write 194 Mixed 80.4 115% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 500GB 2,264 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 132GB free, PID a007 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 69.4 Write 65.1 Mixed 37.2 70% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 0215 CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 12GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 14.2 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 14.9 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 20: 3R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	29%	21	227	172	60	24.5"	1920 1080	AOC2590 2590G5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire XC-780 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-780

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	154x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	106x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	63x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	90x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	87x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	37x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	24x
RBUSNS8180DS3128GH 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 4,820 samples	15x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	11x

RAM
ACR24D4U7S8MB-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 39%, 2,540 samples	30x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	26x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $176

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16