Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190812
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 13:28
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 266
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 814
82% 649 Pts
64-Core 1084
73% 1084 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 41.4
35% 43.8 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36
33% 38.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$75
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,628
Write 1,988
Mixed 1,878
480% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 84.6
285% 97.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,221
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 1,008
762% 1,031 MB/s
Poor: 205% Great: 333%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
433GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 91 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 121
Write 107
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 90.7
74% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
97GB free
Firmware: CR100-13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 38 39 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 36.8
Write 38.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 37.6
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
129% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 26.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 24.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 23.5" 1280 720 ACI24C7 ASUS VP247
Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 9,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $823
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback