Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 07:48
Run Duration365 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$309
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 71.9
1-Core 138
2-Core 267
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 956
92% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,434
96% 1,434 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$450
Asus(1043 8784) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 121
Parallax 132
107% 128 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 124
Splatting 112
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 118%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 500GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 866 659 687 692 683 677 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 29% Great: 36%
Amd-raid Array 6 312GB
291GB free
Firmware: 9.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2377 2378 893 769 766 764 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
240% Outstanding
Read 1,651
Write 2,363
Mixed 1493
SusWrite 1,324
386% 1,708 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 48.7
176% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 689
DQ Write 1,062
DQ Mixed 680
570% 810 MB/s
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
581GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 170 171 170 171 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 169
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 170
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$90
538GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 145 145 148 147 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 138
Write 138
Mixed 80
SusWrite 146
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 112%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 188 184 189 184 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 87.5
Write 219
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 186
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
315% 3 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.8% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 25.6
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 27.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 96.9
41% 96.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 60: 9R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 23% 62 260 180 144 27" 2560 1440 AUS2722 VG27A
History: Score 47: 6R 4G 5B | Score 60: 9R 5G 0B
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 73,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,207
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $394Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback