Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 04:30
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$202
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 284
89% 167 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 835
76% 638 Pts
64-Core 1325
82% 1325 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.2% Above average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 79.8
Parallax 62.5
46% 66.4 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 69.7
58% 70.6 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 64 54 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 474
Write 398
Mixed 372
SusWrite 82.3
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 28
113% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 47.5
DQ Mixed 95.1
79% 119 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 92%
Pcie SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2846 3433 3466 3443 3271 3350 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
392% Outstanding
Read 1,995
Write 3,265
Mixed 1,998
SusWrite 3,302
600% 2,640 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 66.5
218% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,144
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 1,003
736% 973 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 392%
Great: 556%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 166 161 159 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 68.3
Write 140
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 162
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
187% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 12TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 148 151 153 150 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 169
Mixed 139
SusWrite 149
116% 157 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 1
410% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16G-D4-2400-MR 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 24.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 15.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 30 84.6" 3072 1728 SAM0F13 SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $931
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback