HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 87C3
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '21 at 04:06
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 58.4 1-Core 135 2-Core 272 81% 155 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 762 72% 600 Pts	64-Core 943 58% 943 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.2% Very good	Lighting 88.8 Reflection 87.3 Parallax 81.3 72% 85.8 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 77.6 Splatting 69 69% 87.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 850 Write 1,084 Mixed 585 188% 840 MB/s	4K Read 38.9 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 60.6 203% 74.8 MB/s	DQ Read 771 DQ Write 723 DQ Mixed 706 541% 733 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 787GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 57 50 54 49 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	23.8% Poor	Read 31.7 Write 69.8 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 51.2 33% 44.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 2x8GB 10,593 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63% Good	MC Read 26.5 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 25 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 23.6 53% 18.5 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 52: 6R 7G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
52%	27%	52	330	263	60	23.5"	1920 1080	SAM0D2C C24F390

History: Score 44: 5R 4G 7B | Score 52: 6R 7G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	1,573x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	1,300x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	746x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,697x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	805x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	571x

SSD
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-1T00-1106 1TBWDCBench 236%, 4,202 samples	919x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1006 1TBWDCBench 191%, 10,094 samples	805x
WD BLACK SDBPNTY-512G-1106 512GBWDCBench 210%, 3,022 samples	554x

RAM
HP32D4U8D8HC-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 97%, 1,949 samples	844x
HP32D4U8S8HC-8XR 2x8GBKingstonBench 84%, 3,401 samples	600x
HP32D4U8D8HC-16XR 2x16GBKingstonBench 98%, 1,304 samples	497x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $1,146

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16