Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3 (all builds)
Motherboard	MONSTER TULPAR T7 V19.3
Memory	22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190716
Uptime	18 Days
Run Date	Jun 29 '21 at 21:19
Run Duration	358 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 93.1 1-Core 131 2-Core 245 89% 156 Pts	4-Core 461 8-Core 672 71% 566 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1D05 1065) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.95% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 94.2 Parallax 8.2 5% 36.1 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 7 Splatting 11 8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-RC500 500GB 4,418 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 324GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFA12.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 566 458 563 539 534 561 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	132% Outstanding	Read 341 Write 1,220 Mixed 589 SusWrite 537 154% 672 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 41.5 165% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 892 DQ Write 694 DQ Mixed 1,016 700% 868 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 233%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 931GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1392 1089 1437 1327 1341 633 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	258% Outstanding	Read 1,346 Write 1,267 Mixed 1,389 SusWrite 1,203 294% 1,301 MB/s	4K Read 50.9 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 76.4 246% 86.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,336 DQ Write 1,094 DQ Mixed 1,202 904% 1,211 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 258% Great: 365%
WD Elements 25A3 16TB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 39 38 39 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 35.3 Write 35.5 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 39.3 48% 35.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 1.6 319% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A3 16TB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3.5TB free, PID 25a3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 168 160 168 167 170 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Read 204 Write 192 Mixed 146 SusWrite 166 236% 177 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 2.2 340% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x16GB 46,387 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.3% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 21.4 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 25.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 61.9 65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 164%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 42: 3R 6G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
42%	42%	43	285	206	144	17.3"	1920 1080	BOE07B6

History: Score 19: 3R 0G 4B | Score 54: 7R 3G 10B | Score 42: 3R 6G 9B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TULPAR T7 V19.3 Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V19.3

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	193x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	110x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	81x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	2x

SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 190%, 13,215 samples	29x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	24x
MZVLB256HBHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 199%, 3,806 samples	13x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	67x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	61x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16