HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z240 Tower Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 802F
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170602
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '17 at 11:23
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 1,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 190 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 559 56% 455 Pts	64-Core 554 34% 554 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 36.6 Reflection 29 Parallax 33.3 30% 33 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 36.9 Splatting 33.7 29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 460GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 381 Write 314 Mixed 317 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 24.8 4K Mixed 16.1 63% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35 DQ Write 53.5 DQ Mixed 17.9 21% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	245% Outstanding	Read 1,942 Write 1,529 Mixed 1,536 371% 1,669 MB/s	4K Read 37.3 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 57.6 189% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 168 172% 282 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 245% Great: 353%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 186 4633 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2527 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 16620 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1041 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 210 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 112 112 266877 (C2) HDA temperature 108 102 44 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54% Above average	Read 94.8 Write 92.9 Mixed 89.1 69% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.27 99% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 98%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73 8,426 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 298GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5947 (03) Spinup time 253 178 4116 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 820 (05) Reallocated sector count 196 196 121 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15781 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 249 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 166 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 941 (C2) HDA temperature 107 101 45 (C4) Reallocation count 181 181 19 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 107 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	39% Below average	Read 65.5 Write 70.5 Mixed 66.4 51% 67.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 0.84 4K Mixed 0.15 62% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 313 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65.5% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 21.3 67% 23.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 19.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1,108x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	350x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	276x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	228x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	209x
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples	179x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples	138x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	98x
MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GBCrucialBench 77%, 2,468 samples	74x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	158x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	103x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	102x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $180

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16