Asus CG8250

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CG8250  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8250
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110701
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 29 '21 at 17:56
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 97
2-Core 189
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 453
53% 410 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.6% Poor
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 32.4
26% 32.9 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 23.1
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 69 69 66 67 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 109
Write 96.9
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 65.7
21% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 23.6
66% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.5
DQ Write 88.9
DQ Mixed 24.9
27% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
110GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 114 119 119 121 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 118
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
164GB free
Firmware: GR2OA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 79 70 67 68 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 74.9
Write 57.2
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 69.7
42% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLZ302G08-MDJHB 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 3R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 14% 70 235 115 60 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D32 C27F390
History: Score 10: 2R 0G 0B | Score 30: 3R 4G 3B
Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 33% - Below average Total price: $527
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback